The Associative Property of Rooftop Rent
7 May 2008
One Comment
I previously wrote about our favorite rooftop owner in a stalemate with Cubs on a fair rooftop rent agreement. 
Seems like Tom now is paying the rent to the Cubs in a new agreement announced in today’s press release.
Since we are bartering our garage for access to coveted rooftop games, we have a vested interest in this squabble over rent. Thank God the rent is paid and the Cubs won’t obstruct his view…or should I say “our” view? Remember, rent paid to the Cubs is actually rent paid to us…in rooftop games, free beer and all-you can-eat BBQ.
very dicey here as the infamous tom, with the apparent interest of personal GREED over everything, apparently has NOTHING and NOBODY who likes him for anything besides his PRETEND money while he STILL goes along selling tickets WITHOUT reprimand for one of his interest only leveraged to the tilt and shambled down rooftop but it is completely CLOSED and another that does not appear to have an SPECIAL CLUB LICENSE that you need to LEGALLY sell admission and serve beer/wine. it’s odd that anyone would support this clown as his new OVERPRICED and OVER-ENGINEREED interest only leveraged to the tilt rooftops are OUT OF BOUNDS with a weak view. plenty of other great rule following rooftops inside the foul poles. why risk it?
Leave your response!